'Warts'?! A Churchill apologist rears their ugly head/mind.

It is fairly obvious where you stand.

Not interested in an open discussion of the real Churchill but happy to attack those who do. You are the perfect example of those who only want free speech on their limited terms--they can speak but anyone else who is critical of the white hegemony is silenced.

That Churchill was a racist is undeniable. Hence the real becomes a carefully constructed myth that is defended by The Usual Suspects: and attack, of course, is the best method of defense.