Totally agree Wesley.

If you agree with the evidence provided by geologist Robert Schoch on the erosion patterns on the base of The Sphinx then it is much much older than the orthodox chronology states. This is still highly disputed territory.

Ifyou go with the contention then you are looking at monumental architecture being created by a civilisation of unknown origin, then what follows is a glorious detective story with clues all around but as yet we have fingerprints but no body.

It is still circumstantial but its a very interesting journey and if true is utterly mind-blowing. To call it pseudoscience or pseudoarchaeology is just the fear of the unknown and orthodox dogma trying to silence alternative theories. At the very least it is great fun to discover.

Marc